Archive for June, 2007

Second Democrat joins race against Gilchrest

Posted in Maryland Political News by Administrator on June 29th, 2007

Second Democrat joins race against Gilchrest
By Joseph Gidjunis
Salisbury Daily Times Staff Writer
June 29, 2007

CAMBRIDGE — A second Democrat announced Thursday a campaign to dethrone nine-term U.S. Rep. Wayne Gilchrest, R-Md., demonstrating that the 1st District seat is being eyed by both sides of the aisle.
http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070629/NEWS01/706290329/1002

Union-buster company attacks Stephen Crockett for posting union information

Posted in Maryland Political News, Labor union news & views by Administrator on June 29th, 2007

Union-buster company attacks Stephen Crockett for posting union information
June 29th, 2007

http://efcaupdate.squarespace.com/home/2007/6/19/this-company-epitomizes-why-the-employee-free-choice-act-is-.html

http://efcaupdate.squarespace.com/home/2007/4/18/efca-pros-and-cons.html

I am so proud to have these evil people against me!

Teamsters Union Says Good Riddance to Fast Track Trade Authority

Posted in Labor union news & views by Administrator on June 28th, 2007

June 28th, 2007
Official Statement Of Teamsters General President James P. Hoffa
Contact:
Leigh Strope
(202) 624-6911
June 28, 2007

(Washington, D.C.) – This weekend, President Bush’s “Fast Track” trade negotiating authority expires for good. It has been a long and difficult five years for workers everywhere. With the expiration of Fast Track, perhaps this finally means that we can move in an entirely new direction on our trade and globalization policies.

Since Fast Track, trade negotiations have been accelerated to an alarming speed, denying legislators and the public the appropriate time to consider the serious ramifications of these agreements. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has used Fast Track to push too many job killing, NAFTA-style trade agreements.

Such agreements have included the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), Chile, Singapore, Morocco, Australia, Bahrain and Oman. Just a few weeks ago, the State Department announced that Bahrain and Oman have been added to its list of worst offenders in failing to suppress human trafficking and forced labor—which is “a modern day form of slavery.” The fact that under Fast Track we passed free trade agreements with these countries is further evidence that these FTAs are nothing more than a one-way street to the bottom for workers everywhere.

Such misguided trade policies have exacerbated stagnant wages and growing job insecurity in the United States. We have lost more than 3 million manufacturing jobs since 2001, many to offshore outsourcing, while an increasing number of white-collar service-sector jobs are also at risk. At the same time, our trade deficit has ballooned to nearly $800 billion. For the USTR to call for more Fast Trade deals is ridiculous.

Unfortunately, the damage that Fast Track has done is not entirely over. Still lingering is the Peru, Panama, Colombia, and the South Korea free trade agreements. This Saturday, as the Fast Track clock expires, the terribly negotiated South Korea FTA will be signed.

The Teamsters Union strongly opposes ALL of these job-killing trade deals. Until the U.S. trade model and policies begin to focus on job creation here at home, we will continue to oppose such deals.

I also would like to add that it is offensive and insulting to trade unionists that the Bush administration and Congress would even consider an FTA with Colombia. We should not be entering into a new free trade agreement with a government that allows workers who fight for their right to organize and for better wages to be killed with impunity.

Rather than staggering blindly into extending Fast Track, our nation needs to regain our economic footing. We must have a real discussion about the real costs and impacts our trade policies have had for working men and women here at home and abroad. We need to pass China currency legislation such as Ryan-Hunter and Stabenow-Bunning. We need to stop the skyrocketing trade deficit that we are facing. We need to promote and encourage more Buy-America procurement policies. We need to pass anti-offshoring legislation. The list goes on. Absent real action and an honest assessment of our trade agreements and policies, we will undoubtedly find ourselves in an even worse predicament 10 years from now.

And so on June 30th, the Teamsters Union celebrates the end to this terrible process, and we look forward to working with members of Congress on a new economic trade model that creates jobs at home and lifts up workers everywhere.

http://www.teamster.org/07news/nr_070628_2.asp

Political, Union Leaders Say Fight for Employee Free Choice Is Not Over

Posted in Labor union news & views by Administrator on June 28th, 2007

Political, Union Leaders Say Fight for Employee Free Choice Is Not Over
by James Parks, Jun 27, 2007

http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/06/27/political-union-leaders-say-fight-for-employee-free-choice-is-not-over/

The fight to allow workers a free choice to join a union without employer interference is far from over. After a handful of obstructionist senators blocked a vote on the Employee Free Choice Act yesterday, an array of political and union leaders made it clear the momentum is growing for this legislation and that it’s a matter of when, not if, this bill becomes law. The next step: Elect a Senate that will pass the bill and a president who will sign it.

Here’s a sample of some statements issued after the vote:

AFSCME President Gerald McEntee: “The struggle to enact the Employee Free Choice Act is not over. A majority of senators are now on record supporting an America where the middle class thrives, seniors can afford their prescriptions, parents can afford to send their children to college and workers can afford to retire with security.” (See video.)
Presidential candidate John Edwards: “Today, a majority of the Senate stood up to make it easier for workers to join a union. A minority of senators showed which side they are on by blocking the bill today—but they won’t be able to block it forever. If a Republican can join the Republican Party by signing their name to a card, any worker in America ought to be able to join a union by doing exactly the same thing.”
Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), the bill’s sponsor, along with 46 other senators: ” Today’s vote sends a clear signal to the American public about which party stands with working people—and although we were blocked today we will not give up and we will not give in. I can promise that we will be back. There may be obstacles along the way, but we’ll keep up the fight until we get a victory for working families.”

United Steelworkers President Leo Gerard: “The Employee Free Choice Act will remain an issue working families and their communities will continue to work until we achieve a Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate and elect a new president in 2008.

Communications Workers of America President Larry Cohen: “This vote—along with the March vote by the House of Representatives—is a huge accomplishment for union activists and members of the Stewards Army who have invested their time and effort to make a real difference.”

Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.): “I am disappointed the Senate failed to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. Strengthening our workers’ right to organize shouldn’t be controversial. It will be working Americans, united and organized, that will help us restore a sense of shared prosperity and security to this nation.”

AFT President Edward McElroy: “The current fight for workers’ rights is gaining momentum and will not be stopped. A union card is a tried-and-true ticket to the middle class, and the AFT and its members will continue to advocate for laws—at all levels of government-that safeguard the freedom of employees to join a union and bargain for a better life.”
Mine Workers President Cecil Roberts: “Those who voted today to deny working men and women the ability to decide for themselves whether or not they want a union where they work also voted to allow the atmosphere of corporate-sponsored fear and intimidation so prevalent in union representation elections to continue. I want them to know that we will remember their vote, too.” (Click here to hear a radio debate with Roberts on the Employee Free Choice Act.)

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.): “More working families, not fewer, deserve access to the higher wages, better health care, and retirement security that union membership brings. Today the Senate sought simply to reaffirm the basic proposition that every worker in this country has the democratic right to associate freely and, if they so choose, join or form a union.”

Presidential candidate Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.): “Passing this legislation would have been a crucial step in the fight for strengthening worker’s rights. Although I am frustrated by the obstructionist tactics employed by some Senators to prevent full debate on this measure, I will continue to work to put real teeth in our labor laws and help improve the working conditions for all American workers.”

Rep. Phillip Hare (D-Ill.): “Anti-union forces should take only temporary comfort in today’s vote. With 69 percent of Americans supporting the Employee Free Choice Act, I expect that any senator who blocked this bill will be held to account by their constituents. This legislation will pass. It’s only a matter of when.”

Political news

Posted in Maryland Political News by Administrator on June 27th, 2007

Democrats plan amendment to cut funds for vice president’s office

By Jim Abrams
Associated Press Writer
Annapolis Capital
June 27, 2007

WASHINGTON (AP) - House Democrats, responding to Vice President Dick Cheney’s assertion that his office is exempt from certain national security disclosure requirements, said Tuesday they will try to strip his office’s funding.

The proposal to eliminate funding for Cheney’s office could come up Thursday as an amendment to an annual spending bill, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said.
http://www.capitalonline.com/cgi-bin/read/2007/06_26-46/XXX

——————————————————————————–

Town officials briefed on state issues
By Beth Ward
Staff Writer
June 27, 2007
OCEAN CITY — Although the next legislative session is more than six months away, state representatives briefed municipal officials on statewide issues Tuesday, including the budget crisis at the Maryland Municipal League annual convention.

With a structural deficit of about $1.5 billion, balancing the state budget will be a serious challenge come January, Speaker of the House Michael Busch said.
http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070627/NEWS01/706270384/1002

——————————————————————————–

White returns as port chief

He left 2 years ago after battling Ehrlich administration

By Meredith Cohn
Sun reporter
June 27, 2007

James J. White, who left the port of Baltimore two years ago after a public battle for control with his former bosses in the Republican Ehrlich administration, will return to lead the state-owned terminals this summer.

Yesterday’s announcement was expected by some members of the port community, who had flooded new Democratic O’Malley administration officials with calls to bring back the executive director.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.port27jun27,1,5539759,print.story?coll=bal-business-headlines

——————————————————————————–

White returns to Port of Baltimore

Andy Rosen

Daily Record Business Writer

June 27, 2007
James J. White, the port of Baltimore’s longest-serving leader in the past two decades, is coming back.
Gov. Martin O’Malley on Tuesday appointed White as executive director of the Maryland Port Administration, a position White held from 1999 to 2005. White said he will start at the beginning of August.
http://www.mddailyrecord.com/article.cfm?fuseaction=print&id=1703&type=UTTM

——————————————————————————–

O’Malley is working to change ‘big-city politician’ image

Associated Press
The Daily Record, Easton Star Democrat

June 27, 2007
SALISBURY — He has clambered into a chicken house, revved a tractor and helped lift oysters from the Chesapeake Bay.
Gov. Martin O’Malley is working hard to shed his image as a big-city politician, with the former Baltimore mayor making several treks to the Eastern Shore in his first few months in office.
http://www.mddailyrecord.com/article.cfm?fuseaction=print&id=1701&type=UTTM

Republican thwart majority rule over Employee Free Choice Act by denying Senators their right to vote

Posted in Labor union news & views by Administrator on June 27th, 2007

http://www.democratictalkradio.com/wordpress/?p=418

Time for Republicans to Choose: Bush-Cheney or America

Posted in Whig Letters by Administrator on June 25th, 2007

Time for Republicans to Choose: Bush-Cheney or America

The recent claim by Dick Cheney to have both executive privilege and not to be part of the executive branch of government seems to amount to a claim that Cheney is simply above the rule of law. It appears that both Bush and Cheney think they rule by divine right like the absolute monarchs of medieval Europe or the dictators of the old Soviet Bloc. Both need to be impeached. Until they are removed from office, the media, Congress and the courts should be aggressively investigating, exposing and opposing their abuses of power.

Bush has ignored the rule of law repeatedly. He has wiretapped American citizens without court orders in clear violation of the law by claiming nonexistent Presidential authority. Both Bush and Cheney lied to the American public and Congress to take America into an illegal war in Iraq.

Republican politicians helped Bush and Cheney pack our federal courts and the US Department of Justice with partisan political hacks who do everything possible to make illegal actions benefiting Republicans appear legal. Elections have been essentially rigged by denying millions of Americans of their right to vote or to have their votes accurately counted.

Corporation channeling money to Republican organizations or candidates have been able to win billions of dollars worth of no-bid government contracts under highly questionable or obviously illegal conditions. Corporate givers were able to ignore government regulations and federal laws concerning oil and mineral leases, environmental considerations, worker safety, consumer rights, fair competition, price-gouging and anti-monopoly concerns.

Congress should immediately repeal the falsely-named Patriot Act because neither Bush or Cheney can be trusted with the powers that law hands to the White House and the Executive Branch. All funding for the White House should be strictly limited and closely monitored by Congress.

White House funding should be conditioned on Cheney revealing all details of his Energy Task Force and all details of Karl Rove’s role concerning the various election scandals seemingly connected to the White House. All details concerning the outing of CIA agent Valerie Palme and the lies promoted by the White House leading up to the invasion of Iraq should be revealed to Congress. White House involvement in torture and secret prisons should be publicly exposed.

Our national security has been undermined. Our civil liberties threatened. Our traditional political freedoms badly trampled by an out of control Executive Branch actively abetted by Republicans in Congress and Republican federal judges.

Corruption and incompetence dominates the leadership of the Republican Party at the state and national level almost everywhere in America. Investigations are underway in state after state from California to Texas to Ohio of Republican political abuses. Many more are called for in places like Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

Partisan political considerations should never trump the rule of law. It is up to Republicans to clean-up the corruption and contempt of American political traditions by their leadership. Republican leaders need to choose between their Party leadership and the future of the American nation!

Written by Stephen Crockett (co-host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com ). Mail: P.O. Box 283, Earleville, Maryland 21919. Phone: 443-907-2367. Email: midsouthcm@aol.com .

Feel free to publish without prior approval and at no charge.

Suppressing the Vote

Posted in Uncategorized by Administrator on June 25th, 2007

Suppressing the Vote

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut?bid=7&pid=207819

Thanks to rigorous work by the Brennan Center for Justice and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, it is clear that the US. Attorney scandal – as outrageous as it is on its own – is part of a much broader effort by the Bush Administration to use government institutions for partisan gain.

In their report – Using Justice to Suppress the Vote – the two pro-democracy, pro-civil rights organizations demonstrate that the Administration used federal agencies charged with protecting voters’ rights to promote voter suppression, influence voting rules, and gain advantage in battleground states. This was achieved through a four-pronged strategy: dismantling the infrastructure at the Department of Justice; fomenting a fear of rampant voter fraud (which has subsequently been disproved – it actually occurs “statistically…about as often as death by lightning strike”); politically motivated prosecutions; and restricting registration and voting.

The actions of two Bush appointees who recently testified on the Hill – Hans von Spakovsky and Bradley Schlozman– are illustrative of the effort to restrict voter turnout in a manner that favors Republican candidates. In January 2006, von Spakovsky was given a recess appointment to the Federal Election Commission (the agency charged with enforcing the Federal Election Campaign Act – he’s now having one helluva time in his confirmation hearing). Prior to that, he worked for three years as the appointed Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division at Justice.

In a letter to the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, six former career attorneys – who worked under both Republican and Democratic Administrations spanning 36 years – wrote that von Spakovsky “played a major role in… inject[ing] partisan political factors into decision-making on enforcement matters and into the hiring process…. Moreover, he was the point person for undermining the Civil Rights Division’s mandate to protect voting rights.” The career attorneys say that von Spakovsky “assumed primary responsibility for the day to day operation of the Voting Section” and was handed “the authority to usurp many of the responsibilities of the career section chief….”

Von Spakovsky played a key role in fomenting a fear of voter fraud – even writing under the pseudonym “Publius” in June 2005 to “warn of its dangers” and support restrictive photo ID requirements. He asserted that there was “no evidence” that such laws disproportionately disenfranchise minority voters but there was indeed a widespread problem of ineligible voters influencing election outcomes.

At the same time – despite his article and having served on the Fulton County Board of Election – von Spakovsky saw no conflict of interest in taking the lead on reviewing Georgia’s proposed photo ID requirement as the DOJ is required to do. He proceeded to approve the law, overruling the career staff’s near unanimous decision that it violated the Voting Rights Act by weakening minority voting strength. Both the state and federal courts later ruled the law unconstitutional.

According to the letter from the six career attorneys the aftermath of the Georgia decision was “at least as disturbing as the decision-making process.” The Deputy Chief who led the career team’s review – a 28-year Civil Rights Division attorney with 20 years in the Voting Section – was involuntarily transferred without explanation. Three others left the Voting Section “after enduring criticism and retaliation.” The single attorney who did not recommend against the Georgia ID law – a new attorney – “received a cash award.” In all, over 55 percent of the attorneys have left the Voting Section since 2005.

Other stellar moments in the von Spakovsky tenure: overruling a unanimous recommendation from career attorneys against Tom DeLay’s redistricting plan (the Supreme Court later ruled, “In essence the State took away the Latinos’ opportunity because Latinos were about to exercise it.”); overruling career staff who had sought more information regarding the impact of a new Arizona voter ID law on minorities (in the end, it blocked tens of thousands of voters from casting a ballot); pressuring a Republican commissioner, Paul DeGregorio, at the Election Assistance Commission to rescind a letter stating that Arizona had to accept federal voter registration forms that did not include proof of citizenship (DeGregorio e-mailed von Spakovsky asking if this was “an attempt by you to put pressure on me – and the EAC? If so, I do not appreciate it”; also, a proposed “deal” by von Spakovsky to have the Civil Rights Department reconsider its position on provisional ballots in exchange for cooperation on the new Arizona law garnered this response from DeGregorio, “I do not agree to ‘deals,’ especially when it comes to interpretation of the law.”); advocating for keeping eligible citizens off of the voter rolls if registration information can’t be verified by a “computer match” (as inevitably will occur due to typos and other mistakes by election officials; when Washington State followed von Spakovsky’s counsel the courts struck the law down); pushing voter purges in battleground states (the kind that contributed to the Florida 2000 debacle) before the 2006 election instead of enforcing federal requirements that states make voter registration more accessible; causing the DOJ to take the position that voters cannot go to court to enforce their rights under the Help America Vote Act (the first time the Voting Section took a position against voters’ right to go to court) – this position was rejected by every federal court which considered it.

“Mr. von Spakovsky was central to the administration’s pursuit of strategies that had the effect of suppressing the minority vote,” said Joseph Rich, a former Justice Department Chief of the Voting Section.

Another key player in the politicization of the DOJ for partisan gain is Bradley Schlozman. His efforts to dismantle the political infrastructure at Justice were reported on the front page of the Washington Post this week. Schlozman was named Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights in 2003 and, in 2005, was appointed Acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights.

Schlozman oversaw the historic shift of the Civil Rights Division away from enforcing federal civil rights protections to ensuring a staff and an agenda that would further partisan goals. Career hiring and personnel decisions were removed from career managers and given to political appointees – negating a policy which had been implemented during the Eisenhower Administration in order to insulate civil servants from political gamesmanship. The mass exodus from the Voting Section occurred under Schlozman’s watch, and seven career managers were removed from the Civil Rights Division. Career supervisors were ordered to alter performance evaluations – improving those for individuals who were supportive of Bush Administration positions, and weakening evaluations for others who failed to toe the line. Experienced civil rights attorneys were removed, transferred, or denied cases in favor of new hires who lacked experience but had the right conservative credentials.

In fact, one current lawyer speaking to the Post under condition of anonymity said of Schlozman’s recent testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, “When he said he didn’t engage in political hiring, most of us thought that was just laughable. Everything Schlozman did was political. And he said so.”

Schlozman was involved in both the Texas redistricting and Georgia ID decisions to overrule career staff, and the personnel fallout that followed. But most disturbing was the use of a provision buried in the Patriot Act that allowed Schlozman to serve as an interim US Attorney in the Western District of Missouri without a Senate confirmation hearing. Schlozman replaced Todd Graves who had resisted a purge of voters from the rolls as Schlozman had urged. Once he was installed, Schlozman also brought four high-profile indictments against individuals working in low-income and minority communities for voter registration fraud just one week prior to the tight Senate contest between Republican incumbent Jim Talent and then-Democratic challenger Claire McCaskill. The result was bad press for McCaskill and other Democrats. Schlozman’s decision was contrary to a longstanding, written Department of Justice Guidance stating: “Federal prosecutors and investigators should be extremely careful to not conduct overt investigations during the pre-election period or while the election is underway.” (Schlozman recently had to change his initial testimony in which he claimed “that he ‘acted at the direction of the director of the Election Crimes Branch in the Public Integrity Section’ in filing the indictments. This initial testimony “infuriated public integrity attorneys who… pride themselves on staying out of political disputes.”)

In a recent op-ed, Rich wrote, “For decades prior to this administration, the Justice Department had successfully kept politics out of its law enforcement decisions. Hopefully, the spotlight on this misconduct will begin the process of restoring dignity and nonpartisanship to federal law enforcement.”

So how can dignity and nonpartisanship be restored and even strengthened?

The Brennan Center for Justice and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law suggest that von Spakovsky be rejected for an FEC position that – as Senator Barack Obama ☼ wrote – calls for a “record of nonpartisanship, fairness and judgment necessary to enforce election laws.” Congress should also exhaustively investigate any government efforts to propagate fear of voter fraud, restrict voting rights, and suppress the vote. Finally, Congress should advance a truly nonpartisan fair elections agenda, including: the banning of inaccurate and partisan pre-election purges of the voter rolls; blocking discriminatory voter ID laws that could disenfranchise millions of voters; and enacting legislation that protects voters and electoral integrity such as the Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Act, Count Every Vote Act, and Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act .

Kudos to these two important civil rights organizations for recognizing the magnitude of this scandal and offering a plan to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.

The Changing Face of America

Posted in Uncategorized, Maryland Political News by Administrator on June 25th, 2007

The Changing Face of America
Republicans should fear, but Democrats can’t cheer

© Bryan Zepp Jamieson
6/23/07
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com/Politics/pew.htm

Pew came out with their big report this week, the one that measure
political, social and religious trends in America. Religion didn’t show
any major changes, and Americans are becoming more liberal on social
issues such as gay marriage and mixed race dating, but in politics,
there has been a major sea change.

One of the strangest poll markers in the survey can be found in the
question, “Are you satisfied with the way thing are going in the country
today?” It’s startling to see that in the immediate aftermath of 9/11,
17% more Republicans expressed satisfaction with how things were going
in America than they did a couple of weeks before. It’s as if they
looked at the smoking ruins of the Trade Center and the two-thousand
point drop in the Dow, rubbed their hands, and murmured, “Ex-cellent.
Everything is going according to plan.”

Now, granted, it’s pretty unlikely that any Republican, with the
exception of Dick Cheney, did that. And in fairness, similar jumps (10%
and 4%, respectively) were seen among Democrats and Independents. I
think that what that particular poll result shows is that when people
engage in frantic flag waving, the critical functions of the brain shut
down. Pep-rally patriotism doesn’t leave much room for awareness, and in
truth, I’m not sure it’s any sort of improvement over the “evil cackle”
Dick Cheney approach. Both are a form of social poison.

The inability to look around with unclouded eyes still afflicts
Republicans. Today, most are still waggling flags and shouting “America!
Boo-yah!” and 58% think things in America are just hunky dory. That
compares with 28% of independents and 14% of Democrats. And the
discontinuity between Independents and Democrats stems in part from the
fact that since 1994 Republicans have been encouraged to self-identify
to pollsters as Independents in hopes of creating the impression that
their attitudes extended beyond the party. To their credit, not many try
this juvenile stunt, but it’s enough to tweak the results when
Republicans stand against the rest of America on something, as happens
more and more these days.

Another startling set of stats occurs early in the report (page 15) in
which the ideological examination of states participating in primaries
(liberal, moderate, conservative, don’t know) is listed. In most states,
moderates are the biggest faction, usually in the 40s. And it’s no
surprise that more voters self-identify as liberals in places like
California or the Northeast. What is really startling is the change in
states that were previously seen as being of the deepest red. Colorado,
for instance, leans liberal over conservative by a 39-13 margin; Utah,
38-22; Arizona 31-20 and Kansas – yes, Kansas – by 29 to 19. In only
eleven states, mostly deep south, do self-identified conservatives
outnumber self-identified liberals.

That’s an amazing change over just a six year period.

Another startling change is in how Americans view the country’s military
might. From World War II on, Americans, by a solid majority, believed
that the best way to ensure peace was through military might. The
question invariably produced a result 15 to 25 points in favor of the
assertion. Then came Iraq.

It’s no surprise that Americans believe attacking and occupying Iraq was
a serious mistake, and that it has made the world a more dangerous
place. Poll after poll has shown that. What IS surprising is that so
many Americans have realized what their leaders have not: that a massive
military is trumped by a determined underground resistance, or what the
boys in the Pentagon like to call “asymmetrical warfare.” Pew’s poll
shows that over all, Americans only barely cling to the fancy that a
strong military means peace, by 49-47. When you deduct the Republicans,
it’s obvious that a majority of Americans no longer believe this to be
true.

Another surprise was attitudes toward Affirmative Action. In 1995, only
57% of Americans approved of Affirmative Action. Now 70% do, including a
majority (56%) of Republicans. The right has spent hundreds of thousands
of man-hours and millions of dollars on this, only to sharply lose
ground. One reason for this is that voters never bought the claim by the
far right that Affirmative Action was “preferential treatment” and when
asked if minorities -should- receive preferential treatment, 62% said no.

People who complain about “big government Democrats” will be startled by
the results to the polling statement, “When government does something,
it is usually inefficient and wasteful.” It produced 61% agreement from
Republicans, and 64% agreement from Democrats. Similarly, 58% of
Democrats believe government regulation of business does more harm than
good (a shift upward over just the past six years) while 57% of
Republicans feel the same way, a shift downward. (they are warming to
the idea as the corruption scandals grow). In both instances, members of
each party are reacting to the corrupt administration the GOP has
inflicted on the country over the past six years.

Republicans remain more willing to sacrifice constitutional rights,
especially everyone else’s. A depressing 40% of Americans feel that a
little security is more important than freedom, but 51% of Republicans
feel that way, provided, of course that the freedoms to make money or
inflict Jesus on others remain. As always, they want to sacrifice YOUR
freedoms, not theirs. For your own good, of course.

Environment is still an overwhelmingly popular issue, with 83% saying
they support stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment,
and 69% agreeing that “we should put more emphasis on fuel conservation
than on developing new oil supplies.” Oddly, while 90% plus of Democrats
and Independents support a stronger environmental approach, the number
of Republicans who support it has dropped from 78% in 1995 to 65% now,
which shows the increasing radicalism and alienation of the GOP.

And that brings us to the single most important item in the survey:
party affiliation. As recently as 2002, the parties were in a dead heat,
with 43% of voters asserting an affiliation with one or the other. Now,
50% of voters consider themselves Democratic, and only 35% Republican.

It’s obvious what’s happening. The GOP right wing, which still controls
the party, has been driving out moderates by the millions. And rather
than simply become independents, they are going all the way and crossing
party lines. That’s why the sudden drop among GOPhers in support for the
environment; the moderates leave, and the hardliners have a stronger
voice within the party ranks.

This in turn will drive out more moderates. Making the party even more
extreme right. Eventually, it could be 100% against the environment, and
make up 10% of the voting public. They won’t win many elections, but by
gawd, they’ll have a united front!

Americans are disaffected and disillusioned, and it’s mostly because of
GOP mismanagement. But this doesn’t translate into a big boost for
Democrats, who have yet to show they can reverse the downward trends of
Iraq, the separation of rich and poor, and the general tone of debate in
the country. Until they do, their advantage is both tenuous and ephemeral.

But for the GOP, the situation is much grimmer. They stand to become the
permanent minority party for the next generation. And they are on a
course to become a small group of nasty, extremist whack jobs, totally
irrelevant to mainstream America.

Much the way the ones in Congress and the White House already are.

Contact your state legislator right now–we need them

Posted in Labor union news & views by Administrator on June 13th, 2007

Dear Stephen,

Working families are struggling to make ends meet these days,
and our middle class is disappearing. The best opportunity
working people have to get ahead economically is by uniting to
bargain with their employers for better wages and benefits.

Send a critical message to your state legislators today urging
them to support the federal Employee Free Choice Act (S. 1041),
a bill that will level the playing field for workers and help
rebuild America’s middle class.

Please contact your state legislator right now–we need their
support for the Employee Free Choice Act. Click on the link
below to take action:

http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/71a31_F19qyD/

The Employee Free Choice Act would restore workers’ freedom to
form unions and bargain.

Recent research has shown that 60 million workers would join a
union if they could, but the current system for forming unions
and bargaining is broken.

The Employee Free Choice Act would make it easier for our
state’s working families to get a union card–the “straightest
ticket to the middle class.”

Please contact your state legislator now by clicking on the link
below:

http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/71a31_F19qyD/

Already, more than 1,000 state lawmakers have shown their
support for the Employee Free Choice Act (S. 1041) by signing on
to the letter to Congress in support of the bill.

Please ask your state lawmakers to join their colleagues from
around the country in supporting the Employee Free Choice Act by
signing on to the letter to Congress.

Please ask your legislators to sign the letter by clicking on
the link below:

http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/71a31_F19qyD/

“We strongly urge you to support the Employee Free Choice Act,”
the letter says, “legislation that would begin to reinstate the
right to form unions that Congress protected for America’s
workers more than 65 years ago.”

We need as many signatures as possible to send a strong message
to Congress: Pass the Employee Free Choice Act and help rebuild
America’s middle class.

Thank you for continuing the fight for the Employee Free Choice
Act.

In solidarity,

Working Families e-Activist Network, AFL-CIO

P.S. Learn more about the Employee Free Choice Act and see
videos of workers like Ivo Camilo, Nikkia Parish and Bill
Lawhorn at the AFL-CIO’s Employee Free Choice Act website:

http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/Ipa31_F19qyJ/


« Previous entries ·