Archive for November, 2007

A Look at Reagan, Clinton and Bush by the Numbers

Posted in Uncategorized by Administrator on November 29th, 2007

Bush Econovomits
# 8 BUSHOVOMITS II

JOBS

NET NEW JOBS PER MONTH

Clinton—237,000

Carter—-218,000

Reagan—175,000

Bush II—-70,000 (He brags on this-wow)

TOTAL STOCK MARKET GROWTH

PERCENT INCREASE PER YEAR

Clinton—41%

Bush I—-21

Reagan—17

Carter——5

Bush II—–4 ( he calls this Zoom?)

How? Yes, much money has been made as the stocks climbed out of deep hole.

Example—Cisco zoomed from $75 to $15. Deep hole. Then, over six years it zoomed to $35.

S& P just recently reached it’s 2000 Level.

One-Half the Dow thousands just go back to 2000 level. Not Dow 30.

HOME COSTS

Average annual income to buy an average priced home

2000-3.2 years—-2006—5.4 years

An increase of 68% over six years.

The next noise you hear will be Foreclosure Boom

INFLATION

Ignore gasoline—home prices—education prices—heath care prices

Everything is beautiful if you can control the numbers.

MONEY SUPPLY

M-3

Increase in each decade

1970—1207 Billion

1980—2266

1990—2612

2000—3693 (6 years)

Increase per year for each decade

1970—120

1980—226

1990—261

2000—615 (6 years) will hit 800?

Life is grand when Chairman and all Federal Reserve Officials are “Conservative” Republicans

Ok! So the Europeans can buy our goods now—

In 2000 it took $.83 to buy a Euro. Now it takes $1.37

3 course-set lunch—London-$61.50—Nyc-$45

Four Seasons Room—London-$1,000—Nyc-$465

DEBT—

1980—Less than 1000 Billion (after 200 years)

1990—4,000 (12 years of Conservative Republicanism)

2000—5700

2007— 8881 (7-10-07) wow! More Spend and Borrow let Kids Pay Tomorrow Conservatism

SPENDING

Clinton last budget 1.84 Trillion. Bush up to 2.9 with one budget to go.

Reagan increased Total Sending by 80%. Bush may tie LBJ at 60%.

Note how Heritage-AEI and all Conservatives count only one-half of the budget as their presidents responsibility. Watch them on Revenues. They will cheat. They will use correlations where there is no connection.

SAVINGS

Total National Savings has gone negative for first time since Conservative Big Crash

PROFITS

Corporate profits at all time high

Buy overseas at $.50 cent per hour labor and sell to suckers as tho $10 per hour labor

Keep minimum wage as low as possible.

Use two part time instead one full time

Do not pay Insurance.

Maximize Profits like good Christians.

Ever hear of optimizing profits?

Buy Washington. It is cheap.

INTEREST RATES

Republican Federal Reserve let Clinton end with a 6.5 % rate then few months later gave Bush a 1% rate. If this Federal Reserve is non-partisan I will shoot a 61 tomorrow.

Greenspan gave Clinton 13 significant rate hikes during campaign years.

Everything is beautiful if you are Mega-Rich.

Clarence Swinney

Political Research Historian since 1991 on Reagan-Clinton-Bush II administrations

Burlington nc

cwswinney@netzero.net

So Much for ‘Remaking’ Its Image: Wal-Mart Sues Brain-Damaged Worker

Posted in Uncategorized, Labor union news & views by Administrator on November 26th, 2007

Nov. 26, 2007

So much for the warm and fuzzy Wal-Mart portrayed in the
company’s latest image ad blitz. Wal-Mart showed its true colors
when news reports revealed the giant retailer sued a former
employee to get back $470,000 it spent on her medical bills.
The former worker, who suffered permanent brain damage in a car
accident, is unable to walk without help or communicate
meaningfully with her family and now lives in a nursing home.
Let’s add ruthless and heartless to Wal-Mart’s rap sheet of low
wages, lousy health care, anti-worker practices and biggest
importer of goods made by exploited and cheap foreign labor.

So Much for ‘Remaking’ Its Image: Wal-Mart Sues Brain-Damaged
Worker
http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/t1a31_F12u9m/

Paul says he won’t support GOP nominee

Posted in Uncategorized by Administrator on November 25th, 2007

Paul says he won’t support GOP nominee

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13702.html

Last month, during a Republican debate, Ron Paul was asked whether he promised to support the GOP nominee next year, no matter who emerges from the primary process. “Not right now I don’t,” Paul said, “not unless they’re willing to end the war and bring our troops home.”

Apparently, in the ensuing weeks, “not right now” has become “no.”

Paul called his Republican presidential rivals, including frontrunner Rudy Giuliani, “neo-conservatives” whom he couldn’t support in the general election should his own bid fail.

“They think we’re supposed to spread our goodness through force,” Paul said. For example, none will pledge not to wage war on Iran, he said. “How could I support something like that?”

Apparently, he can’t. But it means that of the top seven candidates in the Republican field, Paul is the only one who isn’t prepared to support the party’s eventual nominee. It’s not the kind of thing that will go over well within the party, but then again, Paul’s interest in the Republican Party appears nominal — it’s a venue for him to advance his ideas and agenda, not necessarily an opportunity for him to lead the party.

It’s interesting to note the contrast between Paul’s comments and John Edwards’. A couple of weeks ago, Edwards hedged when asked if he would support the eventual Democratic nominee, no matter who it is. When he initially hesitated, it caused a minor stir in Democratic circles — how can Edwards expect to be the party’s nominee if he’s not willing to commit to honoring the party’s nominating process?

No one seems to be saying that about Paul, in large part because no one seems to consider Paul part of the Republican mainstream.

For that matter, it also once again raises the specter of an independent Paul bid.

During an MSNBC interview earlier this month, Norah O’Donnell followed up on this point:

O’DONNELL: Congressman, as you know, most of the other Republicans running for president that you have stood onstage with during the debates, they support a continuation of the war in Iraq. You want to end the war in Iraq. If one of them is awarded the Republican nomination, will you choose a third party? Will you not back that nominee?

PAUL: No, I don’t plan to run in a third party. That’s not my goal. But if we have a candidate that loves the war and loves the neo-con position of promoting our–

At that point in the interview, O’Donnell interrupted, and the interview didn’t return to the subject. But the “I don’t plan to run” language, coupled by this week’s remarks about not supporting the eventual GOP nominee, should continue to raise eyebrows when it comes to Paul’s intentions.

Five Things Mike Huckabee Doesn’t Want You to Know About Him

Posted in Uncategorized by Administrator on November 25th, 2007

http://www.alternet.org/stories/68397/?page=entire

By John Gorenfeld, AlterNet

Look who’s the dark horse now: Not Fred Thompson, the Law & Order actor whose get-off-my-lawn glower was initially mistaken by the media for Reaganesque magic, but Mike Huckabee, the ex-Arkansas governor with the beady stare and steely proclamations about the Iraq war. You might remember him from the Fox News Channel debate in September, when he reproached Ron Paul by appealing to the “honor” of the Republicans as a reason to keep occupying Baghdad — winning both applause and comparisons to Star Trek’s Klingons.

Suddenly, heading into the primary season, it’s Huckabee who is making moves, polling at 24 points in the crucial primary state of Iowa. (Thompson: three points.) His ratings, as his campaign is gloating, put him within striking distance of Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachussetts

So who is he? His latest ad finds him repeating Chuck Norris internet jokes, borrowing for his campaign a har-har style from Jesse “The Body” Ventura that would suit him well if it were 1999 and he were promising to give Minnesotans tax breaks instead of vowing (as he did the other day) to bomb Iran “in a heartbeat” without consulting Congress if President Huck deems it necessary. “Like our Founding Fathers,” Norris wrote in a mass email to Huckabee supporters on Nov. 13, playing to conservative evangelicals frustrated by bad choices, “he’s not afraid to stand up for a Creator against secularist beliefs.”

A complex figure, Huckabee, an ex-Baptist minister, has been treated in the media as a simpleton, with more attention devoted to his folksiness than his foreign policy (raised in poverty, he comes by this duck-hunter schtick more honestly than did George W. Bush.) But that’s chicken scratch next to the pile of controversies that have remained out of sight.

Here are five things you probably didn’t know about him.

1. Clinton conspiracy theories inspired his biggest mistake.

Like today’s 9/11 Truthers, some conservatives in the 1990s were fixated on signs allegedly revealing monstrous crimes — in their case not discrepancies in the melting point of steel but murders and other dark acts supposedly masterminded by the Clinton family. “Clinton’s biggest crime,” claimed New York Post scribe Steve Dunleavy in 2000, was allowing a Vietnam veteran named Wayne DuMond to go to prison for 50 years after being convicted — falsely, Dunleavy said — for the 1985 knifepoint rape of the 17-year-old cheerleader Ashley Stevens, a distant cousin of the Clintons. “That rape never happened,” Dunleavy said.

In cloudy circumstances, DuMond had suffered castration before his jailing. He said a lynch mob had severed his testicles. They somehow ended up as trophies on the desk of a crooked local sheriff, Coolidge Conlee. In the view of the theorists, Conlee was somehow an “ally” of the Clintons, conjuring up a world in which state politics were on the scale of The Dukes of Hazzard. “He didn’t have no right to take them,” DuMond said of his balls in 1988.

By the time Huckabee became governor, it was believed by many on the Right that DuMond had not only been maimed but also framed by the Bill & Hillary Octopus. Responding to the pressure, Huckabee said DuMond had gotten a “raw deal” and wrote to the imprisoned DuMond: “Dear Wayne, [m]y desire is that you be released from prison. I feel that parole is the best way for your reintroduction into society to take place.”

In June 2001, Ashley Stevens heard on her car radio that DuMond — let loose by the state of Arkansas — had beein seized for strangling 39-year-old Carol Shields in Kansas City, leaving her naked and bound on a bed. Authorities had also suspected DuMond in the similar rape-murder of a 23-year-old pregnant victim, Sarah Andrasek.

Huckabee has since sought to pin the blame on a parole board for freeing the ingrateful DuMond. The next year, however, the Arkansas Times took home an alt-newsweekly award for a piece, “Huckabee Frees Career Rapist,” in which numerous inside sources said it was the governor who made the decision.

2. Win over the Christian Right? He is the Christian Right.

At 15, in a small church in Hope, Ark., young Mike Huckabee came to the pulpit with a pitcher of grape juice. As he poured water into it, he cautioned the flock against “watering down the blood of Christ.” Likewise, after college, Huckabee picked the most fire-and-brimstone employer imaginable.

In the ’70s, there were still two strong factions of Southern Baptists, the fundamentalists and the moderates. The more liberal Baptists hadn’t yet gotten the boot. No moderate, James Robison — a self-described “dark-visaged, angry preacher” for whose TV ministry Huck became communications director — raged against gays. In one piece of footage, Huckabee’s boss bellows that he is “sick and tired, hearing about all the radicals and perverts and the liberals and the leftists and the Communists coming out of the closet. It’s time for God’s people to come out of the closet, out of the churches and change America!”

As press flack, Huckabee had to handle the fallout in 1979 when Robison was kicked off the Dallas station WFAA for citing a National Enquirer report that gays seduce and kill children. Huckabee went on to organize a 1980 strategy session for Robison and the Christian Right as they sought to carve out a role for themselves under Reagan’s Morning In America. Robison, who in his mellower old age has a show on the gold-plated Trinity Broadcasting Network, remains an important liaison between the Bush administration and the Christian Right, and has endorsed his old friend. (It should be noted, however, that as a leader in the Southern Baptist Convention, Huckabee was to the left of a fundamentalist rival he defeated.)

Despite Huckabee’s undiluted credentials — as someone who helped to build the Moral Majority, as a governor who fought to stop gays from adopting — he has been slighted by other like-minded Christian leaders. He’s suffered the indignity of watching evangelist Pat Robertson endorse, in his place, the licentious, pro-choice mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani. The buzz is that other Christian Right leaders just aren’t sold on Huck as a safe bet. One reason is that he’s already pissed off other parts of the party’s base. For example:

3. If you’re a Minuteman, you’ll hate Huckabee.

In the world of Free Republic, the conservative internet community, real Republicans are holding out for a hero to save them from the Mexican immigrants they believe are trying to establish an evil Aztec caliphate in the Southwest. Posts one patriot: “Huckabee. He’s that pro-amnesty governor who lost a lot of weight, right?”

One evening in 2005 during the Minuteman craze, Dr. Wesley Kluck, a pediatrician in the Bible Belt town of Arkadelphia, sat down to e-mail a plea for help to his old classmate, Huckabee. Years ago, Kluck’s third-grader daughter had proudly announced she was learning Spanish to talk to a new best friend. The friend’s mother, Juanita Hernandez, got up before dawn to debone chickens for the food giant Tyson Foods, in a plant along Interstate 65 at an industrial park in nearby Gum Springs.

But just after sunrise, U.S. agents in khaki uniforms had stormed the place. They arrested over a hundred workers, stranding 30 children to fend for themselves.

Around midnight, Kluck tells AlterNet, an email arrived from a concerned Mike Huckabee, who moved to help the families. He personally paid $1,000 to help and demanded an explanation from the federal government. “How is our government benefiting from an abandoned 1-year-old?” Huckabee asked. His constituents were furious. They called up the governor’s office, swearing at him for helping the Mexicans. The calls, Huckabee said, were running “1,000 to 1″ against him.

Even his worst enemy in Arkansas — the maverick Arkansas Times editor Max Brantley, who busted Gov. Huckabee for several ethical violations involving gifts and cash — credits Huck with a rare streak of kindness towards poor immigrants. And that’s not all: Huckabee, eating sandwiches with reporters one day, frankly called some fellow Republicans “driven by sheer racism.”

So jokes about sending Chuck Norris to secure the border will not be enough to endear Huckabee to the GOP’s nativist wing.

4. He supports a crazy tax plan.

On the one hand, Huckabee has managed to alienate the tax-cuts-for-the-rich crowd. Big corporations haven’t invested in him. The Club for Growth has run ads calling him too liberal. He “destroyed the conservative movement in Arkansas,” complains old-school, right-wing activist Phyllis Schlafly. And one former state GOP legislator, in an interview with AlterNet, suggests that a lot of people’s feelings were hurt when Huckabee compared them to “Shi’ite Republicans”: extremists who didn’t understand the practical considerations of governing a state like Arkansas, with its progressive tendencies.

To boost his tax cred, candidate Huckabee has eagerly signed onto FairTax, a proposal to abolish the IRS touted by Atlanta radio host Neal Boortz and at rallies nationwide. Boortz would end the income tax. Instead you’d pay a federal sales tax, and to offset resulting problems, the government would write you checks every month. How much you get depends on the number of people are in your household. And nothing else.

The cash awards, or “prebates,” are supposed to offset how hard it will be on poor people to pay more for groceries. For the middle class, it has the allure of the government paying you, instead of vice-versa, while you get to fire your accountant and throw out your paperwork, unless of course you’re a store owner, in which case you become neighborhood taxman. Says Huck: “I would like April 15 to be another beautiful spring day in America.”

Bruce Bartlett, an economics adviser in the Reagan administration, has accused FairTax of originating in the Church of Scientology, which has historically seen the IRS as a mortal enemy. For some time the IRS refused to honor L. Ron Hubbard’s pyramid scheme as a tax-exempt religion, so his acolytes dreamed up an awfully similar plan to obliterate the agency. FairTax activists, however, maintain that the resemblance between the two plans is coincidental.

But what’s important is whether FairTax itself is workable. Analysts across the political spectrum have said it isn’t. Costs could far exceed the promised 23 percent sales tax, and possible side effects include instantly creating a tax-free black market for everything, screwing up important deductions and punishing older people who’ve paid the old way.

5. If you enjoyed the Terri Schiavo case, you’ll love the Huckabee administration.

After Huckabee became governor of Arkansas in 1996 — taking over from the corrupt Democrat “Jim” Guy Tucker, who had refused to leave office — he grabbed national headlines with a governor’s intervention that year to block the state from paying $419 for a retarded 15-year-old girl’s abortion, her pregnancy stemming from being raped by her stepfather on a camping trip.

Huckabee held up Medicaid payment for the operation. He claimed his hands were tied by the state constitution, Amendment 68, which prevented underwriting of abortions unless the mother’s life was endangered. The Supreme Court had thrown arguments from Christian Right governors like these out before. But Huck held to his guns, which threatened to end the $900 million annual agreement with Washington that gave his state medical money, so long as it played by federal rules.

A compromise was finally reached in which private money footed the bill. Afterward Arkansas Democrat-Gazette columnist Michael Leahy accused Huckabee of having played a moralistic version of poker with the meek, remarking:

We do not need any affable benevolent men playing Supreme Ruler. Maybe it’s the kind of role that a lot of us would slip into if similarly thrusted into high office. Maybe it’s what a lot of people fantasize about in the shower, the selfish, autocratic things we would do if our word were law, our prejudices were given full berth, our resentments were settled — and to hell with mortals’ rules.

Waterboarding Republicans vs. Supporting Our Troops

Posted in Whig Letters by Administrator on November 14th, 2007

You cannot honestly say you are supporting American soldiers if you support the use of torture techniques like waterboarding. By any objective definition, waterboarding is torture. The technique is a type of simulated drowning of a prisoner who has their limbs bound.

The use of simulated drowning is not new. The Nazis used it in World War II. The Iranian secret police used it under the Shah. It was used in the Vietnam War. Dictators in South America have used this kind of torture. It causes severe psychological damage in most cases and has caused deaths. The Bush Administration claims that it is not torture but the claim is false.

The Bush Republicans defending the use of waterboarding are being dishonest with the American people. Torture usually produces very poor quality information. People will say anything to stop torture. Prisoners will confess to crimes they did not commit. They will implicate innocent people. They will invent fictional plots, fictional conspiracies and fictional dangers. In military and national security terms, torture is not effective. Morally, it is simply wrong.

Torture between international combatants has been outlawed by international law and treaties. Use of torture makes the user a war criminal. The United States has long supported this position to prevent American soldiers from being tortured. American government policies, under Bush, concerning the use of torture put American soldiers at grave risk. We will have great difficulty prosecuting enemies who torture our soldiers if we engage in torture ourselves.

For those Republicans (or Democrats) who defend waterboarding as something less than torture, I have a proposal. Whenever a Bush Administration official is called before the House or Senate to testify, they should be waterboarded the entire time they are testifying. The technique, according to the Bush Republicans, elicits honest answers and does not amount to torture. According to these Bush Republicans, waterboarding does not cause any lasting damage.

Personally, I do not believe the Bush Republicans are correct in their position about waterboarding. However, if the Bush Republicans are sincere in their stated beliefs, we should give them an opportunity to prove it. Cabinets officers, White House staffers, Republican Senators, Bush, Cheney, Rove, Bush appointees like Mukasey and other Bush Administration personnel should all be given personal opportunities to prove that waterboarding is not torture and is effective in providing honest answers to questions.

I think it is a much better idea to waterboard Bush Republican leaders (who support waterboarding) in order to prove that waterboarding is not torture than it is to put our soldiers at risk of being tortured. I think all of them would quickly conclude that waterboarding is torture, illegal, dangerous and ineffective.

In the Dark Ages, they had a version of waterboarding. It was called “dunking.” It was a sadistic kind of torture. Naturally, this type of sadistic, ineffective torture still has a strong appeal to certain types of barbaric Republicans!

Written by Stephen Crockett (co-host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com and Editor of Mid-Atlantic Labor.com http://www.midatlanticlabor.com .) Mail: P.O. Box 283, Earleville, Maryland 21919. Phone: 443-907-2367.

Feel free to publish without prior approval.

Righting Reagan’s Wrongs?

Posted in Civil Liberties/ Constitutional Issues by Administrator on November 14th, 2007

Righting Reagan’s Wrongs?
By BOB HERBERT
NYT
Published: November 13, 2007

Let’s set the record straight on Ronald Reagan’s campaign kickoff in 1980.
Skip to next paragraph

Early one morning in the late spring of 1964, Dr. Carolyn Goodman, her
husband, Robert, and their 17-year-old son, David, said goodbye to David’s
brother, Andrew, who was 20.

They hugged in the family’s apartment on the Upper West Side of Manhattan,
and Andrew left. He was on his way to the racial hell of Mississippi to
join in the effort to encourage local blacks to register and vote.

It was a dangerous mission, and Andrew’s parents were reluctant to let him
go. But the family had always believed strongly in equal rights and the
benefits of social activism. “I didn’t have the right,” Dr. Goodman would
tell me many years later, “to tell him not to go.”

After a brief stopover in Ohio, Andrew traveled to the town of Philadelphia
in Neshoba County, Mississippi, a vicious white-supremacist stronghold.
Just days earlier, members of the Ku Klux Klan had firebombed a black
church in the county and had beaten terrified worshipers.

Andrew would not survive very long. On June 21, one day after his arrival,
he and fellow activists Michael Schwerner and James Chaney disappeared.
Their bodies wouldn’t be found until August. All had been murdered, shot to
death by whites enraged at the very idea of people trying to secure the
rights of African-Americans.

The murders were among the most notorious in American history. They
constituted Neshoba County’s primary claim to fame when Reagan won the
Republican Party’s nomination for president in 1980. The case was still a
festering sore at that time. Some of the conspirators were still being
protected by the local community. And white supremacy was still the order
of the day.

That was the atmosphere and that was the place that Reagan chose as the
first stop in his general election campaign. The campaign debuted at the
Neshoba County Fair in front of a white and, at times, raucous crowd of
perhaps 10,000, chanting: “We want Reagan! We want Reagan!”

Reagan was the first presidential candidate ever to appear at the fair, and
he knew exactly what he was doing when he told that crowd, “I believe in
states’ rights.”

Reagan apologists have every right to be ashamed of that appearance by
their hero, but they have no right to change the meaning of it, which was
unmistakable. Commentators have been trying of late to put this appearance
by Reagan into a racially benign context.

That won’t wash. Reagan may have been blessed with a Hollywood smile and an
avuncular delivery, but he was elbow deep in the same old race-baiting
Southern strategy of Goldwater and Nixon.

Everybody watching the 1980 campaign knew what Reagan was signaling at the
fair. Whites and blacks, Democrats and Republicans — they all knew. The
news media knew. The race haters and the people appalled by racial hatred
knew. And Reagan knew.

He was tapping out the code. It was understood that when politicians
started chirping about “states’ rights” to white people in places like
Neshoba County they were saying that when it comes down to you and the
blacks, we’re with you.

And Reagan meant it. He was opposed to the landmark Civil Rights Act of
1964, which was the same year that Goodman, Schwerner and Chaney were
slaughtered. As president, he actually tried to weaken the Voting Rights
Act of 1965. He opposed a national holiday for the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr. He tried to get rid of the federal ban on tax exemptions for
private schools that practiced racial discrimination. And in 1988, he
vetoed a bill to expand the reach of federal civil rights legislation.

Congress overrode the veto.

Reagan also vetoed the imposition of sanctions on the apartheid regime in
South Africa. Congress overrode that veto, too.

Throughout his career, Reagan was wrong, insensitive and mean-spirited on
civil rights and other issues important to black people.
There is no way
for the scribes of today to clean up that dismal record.

To see Reagan’s appearance at the Neshoba County Fair in its proper
context, it has to be placed between the murders of the civil rights
workers that preceded it and the acknowledgment by the Republican
strategist Lee Atwater that the use of code words like “states’ rights” in
place of blatantly bigoted rhetoric was crucial to the success of the
G.O.P.’s Southern strategy. That acknowledgment came in the very first year
of the Reagan presidency.

Ronald Reagan was an absolute master at the use of symbolism. It was one of
the primary keys to his political success.

The suggestion that the Gipper didn’t know exactly what message he was
telegraphing in Neshoba County in 1980 is woefully wrong-headed. Wishful
thinking would be the kindest way to characterize it. Righting Reagan’s Wrongs?

Frank Kratovil wins union endorsement from Ironworkers

Posted in Maryland Political News, Labor union news & views by Administrator on November 13th, 2007

November 9, 2007-DUNDALK, MD. The International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Ironworkers has endorsed Frank Kratovil in his bid for the Democratic nomination for Maryland’s First Congressional District. Union ironworkers in Maryland are represented by Local 16 headquartered in Dundalk. Kratovil is the two-term State’s Attorney for Queen Anne’s County.

“America wants change in Washington and the union ironworkers of Maryland believe Frank Kratovil has the leadership record and campaign organization to deliver change for Maryland’s working men and women,” said Don Glenn, Business Manager for Ironworkers Local 16. “Maryland’s First District deserves a congressman who turns talk into results.”

“I am committed to traditional Democratic values of fair pay, health benefits, and the right to organize,” remarked Frank Kratovil. “I am proud that the Ironworkers’ have confidence in my leadership ability and I will work hard for the people of the First District to bring results back home.”
The International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers Union, AFL-CIO, roots go back to the 1890’s. The current membership stands at approximately 140,000, with 15,000 apprentices. In Maryland alone, there are over 800 members. Members of this union have worked on nearly every major construction project in Maryland, including the Bay Bridge, Key Bridge, Tawes Bridge and other major construction projects around the state and throughout the nation.
Kratovil, 39, his wife Kimberley and four sons reside in Stevensville on Kent Island where he is active as a youth sports coach and member of community boards, including Maryland Special Olympics, Mental Health Association of Maryland, and Mid-Shore Mental Health Systems, Inc.

Kratovil was first elected State’s Attorney in 2002 by unseating a four-term incumbent. He was overwhelming re-elected in 2006. He has served as President of the Maryland State’s Attorneys’ Association and is a leading spokesman at the General Assembly for tougher penalties for violent offenders and anti-gang legislation to assist local law enforcement agencies. In July 2006, the Court of Appeals of Maryland appointed him to the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure. Following the 2006 election, he served as co-chair of Governor O’Malley’s Public Safety Transition Work Group and co-chair of Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler’s Public Safety Transition Team.

http://www.midatlanticlabor.com/appiesnet/wordpress/?p=77

Gas Price Gouging - Call It Like It Is

Posted in Uncategorized by Administrator on November 6th, 2007

Gas Price Gouging - Call It Like It Is
By Robert Weiner and John Larmett
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Tuesday 30 October 2007

Gasoline prices are poised to explode again. Oil companies are setting
up the framework for higher prices because of fears of a Turkish invasion
of Kurdish-controlled Northern Iraq and administration saber rattling about
Iran. Crude oil, at $29.59 a barrel when President Bush took office in
January 2001, is now pushing toward $100. Washington State’s current
gasoline cost of $3.09 per gallon, double Seattle’s 2001 price of $1.52, is
now second only to California in the 48 contiguous states.

Jay Leno joked on the “Tonight Show” October 17, “The Nobel Prize for
Economics was awarded to three people - the CEOs of Exxon, Texaco, and
Shell for figuring out how to quadruple the price of oil over a seven year
period without an actual shortage.”

He’s right, there is no actual shortage. Even if something happened,
Kurdish oil production is less than 1/4 of 1% of the world’s oil, and all
of Iraq generates under 3%. Iran’s share of world production is falling, 5%
last year compared to 8% in 1974. The oil industry uses the unrealized
potential of small disruptions to implement huge price fluctuations. They
are using the fear factor and war profiteering to repeat and increase what
they had last year, the highest profits for any industry in American history.

Furthermore, home heating oil bills are up a third from a year ago,
and double six years ago-a $1700 annual household increase, seven times
inflation. Home heating bills are the silent economic killer to families -
the spotlight has been on car gas prices.

As former House Energy Committee Chair Joe Barton (R-TX) said, “No
federal statute prohibits price gouging.” Leading Democratic Presidential
candidate Hillary Clinton is demanding a new Federal Trade Commission oil
price investigation. Oil companies raised gas prices 24 cents a gallon in
the 24 hours after Katrina. The FTC reported increases “not substantially
attributable to increased costs.” It was pure fear-mongering.

Congress is enacting new laws specifically aimed at price gouging,
sort of. In May, the House passed groundbreaking legislation making gouging
by oil and gas companies a federal crime. The bill calls for jail time and
fines of up to $150 million a day for charging “unconscionably excessive
prices” and taking “unfair advantage” of consumers during a presidentially
declared emergency. The President has indefinitely continued drug
trafficking and national security emergencies and could do the same on oil
prices strangling consumers.

However, there is no “violation” if the price charged is
“substantially attributable to local, regional, national, or international
market conditions.” The House is saying it is not gouging if the public
will bear it. The oil companies could still charge whatever they want-a
loophole big enough for a gas-guzzling Mack truck.

In the Senate, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) has introduced legislation
which defines gouging as “charging an unconscionably excessive price” and
adds a critical “prohibition on market manipulation”, regardless of
“emergency” timing. Cantwell has been pushing for its enactment for over
two years and missed the 60 vote debate “cloture” by just three votes in
2005. With the new Democratic majority, Cantwell succeeded in including
this provision in the Senate energy bill now before a House-Senate
conference. Cantwell’s ban on market manipulation regardless of
“emergencies” could have enormous impact on stopping price spikes.

(An unintended consequence of the Bush saber rattling is even higher
prices and more money to Iran, which defeats the purpose of sanctions to
stop nuclear weapons.)

Congress needs to rise above special interest relationships, protect
Americans from oil company gouging, and define the term so it means what it
really is.
———
Robert Weiner worked six years as a communications director in the
Clinton White House and sixteen years in the House of Representatives. John
Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, worked on
energy-related issues as press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Seattle.

‘Dixie Chicking’: Post-9/11 Blacklisting in the Entertainment Industry

Posted in Civil Liberties/ Constitutional Issues by Administrator on November 6th, 2007

‘Dixie Chicking’: Post-9/11 Blacklisting in the Entertainment Industry

Link

Posted on Oct 25, 2007
Ed Rampell

The HUAC/McCarthy era and Hollywood blacklist may be over, but the
not-so-grand inquisitors are still among us. On March 31, 2007, activist/actor Mike
Farrell, who co-starred in TV’s “M*A*S*H” and co-founded Artists United to Win
Without War, told Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting’s “CounterSpin” radio
program, “There’s a price to be paid for speaking out, and some have paid a
fairly serious price.” Around that same time, at a March 24, 2007, anti-war
Oakland town meeting called by Congresswoman Barbara Lee, actor Sean Penn
stated: “we are encouraged to self-censor any words that might be perceived as
inflammatory—if our belief is that this war should stop today. We cower as you
point fingers telling us to ‘support our troops.’ ”

There are other examples of creative people suffering the consequences of
their outspokenness since 9/11, but none are as compelling as the saga of the
Dixie Chicks, the top-selling “girl group” of all time. Indeed, the red, white
and bluegrass band’s name became a verb meaning censoring and punishing
dissenters: “Dixie Chicking.” The Chicks’ story was turned into a documentary by
two-time Academy Award winner Barbara Kopple (1976’s “Harlan County USA”
and 1990’s “American Dream”) and Cecilia Peck. Cecilia’s father, Gregory Peck,
won the Oscar for portraying the screen’s archetypal fighting liberal,
Atticus Finch, in 1962’s anti-racist “To Kill a Mockingbird,” and produced the
1972 anti-Vietnam-War film “The Trial of the Catonsville Nine,” about the
Berrigan brothers’ anti-draft activities. (In August 2007, Tim Robbins’
L.A.-based Actors Gang troupe presented a reading of the “Catonsville Nine” drama as
a fundraiser.)

“Shut Up & Sing” was presented on March 23, 2007, at Los Angeles’ Pacific
Design Center as part of the West Hollywood Women’s Leadership Conference,
along with a post-screening panel discussion moderated by radio host Stephanie
Miller that included Cecilia Peck and Chicks member Natalie Maines. During the
Dixie Chicks’ 2003 “Top of the World” tour, it was Maines who set off the
firestorm on the eve of “shock and awe” when she told British concertgoers: “
Just so you know, we’re on the good side with y’all. We do not want this war,
this violence, and we’re ashamed that the president of the United States is
from Texas.”

As “Shut Up and Sing” demonstrated, all hell broke loose after Maines’
on-stage comment made the media rounds. The Chicks lost most of their airtime on
right-leaning country-western radio; CD and concert ticket sales plummeted.
Encouraged by reactionary FreeRepublic.com bloggers and DJs, ex-fans destroyed
Chicks CDs en masse during the ensuing “Dixie Chicks Destruction” campaign.
Concerts were picketed by Red-baiters who called the Chicks “traitors” and “
communists,” although the group’s fans were divided, with many remaining
loyal. Worst of all, bomb-sniffing dogs and metal detectors were deployed at
Dixie Chicks concerts. Under heavy security, the Texas trio confronted a 2003
death threat at a Dallas performance, after a letter threatened to shoot Maines
in the same city where John F. Kennedy had been gunned down 40 years
earlier. For his part, President Bush appeared to egg on the Chicks’ persecutors,
saying: “They shouldn’t have their feelings hurt just because some people don’
t want to buy their records.”

Sixty years after the beginning of the Hollywood blacklist, “Shut Up & Sing”
raises the issue of modern-day censorship. Onscreen, Maines reacts to the
group’s loss of airtime, angrily demanding to know, “How is [this] not a
boycott? They haven’t been playing our music for a few weeks.” Paul Beane,
general manager of the Lubbock, Texas, radio station KRBL, declared: “We’re not
going to play them anymore. It’d simply be financial suicide.” At a 2004
Senate hearing, in one of his finer moments, Sen. John McCain mocked Clear Channel’
s denial that the media conglomerate was ordering its radio stations to ban
the Chicks from its corporate airwaves.

(In 2004, CNN quoted Howard Stern as saying that the San Antonio-based Clear
Channel is “very tied to the Bush administration.” In the CNN report, Stern
says: “Clear Channel for years has been defending me. … I criticize Bush
and then I’m fired. … They acted out of politics.”)

During the panel following the March 2007 “Shut Up and Sing” screening,
Stephanie Miller, host of the nationally syndicated “Stephanie Miller Show,”
noted that, ironically, Clear Channel was a co-sponsor of the screening. Despite
Clear Channel’s apparent support of that event, Miller said, “There’s a
concerted effort to shut down progressive talk. [Conservative] Christians are
buying radio stations.” Miller, whose father was Barry Goldwater’s Republican
running mate in 1964, claimed that progressive stations were even being taken
off the air in markets where they were No. 1 in the ratings. Ed Schultz,
whose nationally syndicated program is also heard on Air America, similarly
complained of blacklisting in Ohio markets.

‘Freedom of Speech Is Not Free’

Onscreen, and in the “Shut Up and Sing” panel discussion, Maines displayed
her defiant spirit, which was also evident on Dec. 15, 2003. On that date, at
the height of the backlash against progressive artists, the Dixie Chicks
attended the annual Bill of Rights Dinner presented by the American Civil
Liberties Union’s Southern California chapter in Beverly Hills. The function
celebrated the 212th anniversary of the first 10 amendments of the Constitution and
honored Chicks manager Simon Renshaw (and that other “Dixie Chick,” fellow
Texan Molly Ivins).

Asked which of the 10 amendments was their favorite, Maines, fellow Chick
Emily Robison and manager Simon Renshaw all proclaimed the First. Renshaw added:
“You know! The big one! The whole, like, speech thing one!. … The right to
bear big mouths.” If she had to choose between 10 platinum albums or the
First Amendment, Robison said she preferred “Freedom of speech. That’s …
really easy to answer. It was hard for us to be made an example of this year—but
sometimes you’ve got to be the one. … We still want to stand up for what we
believe is right.”

How is it that Americans pride themselves on living in a free country where
people can speak their minds, but if they express dissent they’re often
punished? “That’s the new system here,” Renshaw responded. “Certain people in
the country have figured out that the best way of actually curtailing freedom
of speech is to make sure people understand freedom of speech is no longer
free, and there’s consequences to exercising free speech. What we saw in 2003,
when people spoke out, there was a very well organized, vociferous group that
immediately went after them and attempted to harm their well-being.
Certainly, the Dixie Chicks saw death threats as a result of what they said,” Renshaw
said.

Maines added: “After September 11th, we felt lots of vulnerability, and
wanted somebody to lead and save us. The country’s been in a strange state … so
try not to get too discouraged about everything that occurred. Things like
that should always be a reminder, that we haven’t necessarily come as far as we
think we have, and we have to constantly be checking ourselves. A mother of
a military guy wrote us saying, ‘Freedom’s not something you can write on a
wall. It’s something you live.’ So I feel proud that I use my freedoms, and
don’t just claim on a daily basis to have freedom.”

Expressing admiration for the ACLU, Maines noted, “Standing up for the
underdog sometimes is not politically correct.” When the tongue-in-cheeky Maines
presented the award to Renshaw, she poked fun at those questioning her
patriotism: “Lots of people will be surprised to hear I was here tonight, because
they were waiting for me to get out of that hole with Saddam.”

Maines added: “Another power the federal government refuses to limit [is]
the power of the corporate media. Not the media’s right to speak, but the media’
s obligation to let other people speak. I don’t want to mention any names,
but freedom of speech requires a clear channel to communications. … We have
to all get active and challenge our government, or … the Bill of Rights will
just be something from history we learn about in school.”

During his acceptance speech, Renshaw mocked “George the Second,”
contending: “Certainly, 2003 … [was] the year America was deceived into a war, and
part of that deception was putting on notice any dissenting voice to ensure
they understood freedom of speech is not free. The concept of ‘shut up and sing
’ was born. … It’s now possible to be ‘Dixie Chicked.’ … There are
many well-organized groups of right-thinking citizens who will work selflessly
to make sure that those who dare to speak up and dissent are suitably ‘Dixie
Chicked.’ They make their views known from the safety and anonymity of the
Internet and radio talk shows. … They’re determined to ensure that we
understand freedom of speech is not free.”

Renshaw continued: “Especially you—Hollywood. You music and movie
celebrities … are all on notice: Shut up and sing—or act or whatever. But shut up! I
also learned we can count on America’s liberal media—yeah, right! Instead
of asking the questions and encouraging debate, our new media conglomerates
issue corporate ‘fatwas’ on those to be ‘Dixie Chicked.’ Music networks can
ban your music, talk shows can vilify your personality, what remains of this
country’s so-called news media trivializes it all into neat 30-second sound
bites. … You may have freedom of speech, but our media now seems to be
designed [so] we’ll never be heard. … A well-known German TV personality … told
us: ‘In my country, our media would never allow this to happen again.’ ”

Finally, Renshaw concluded: “I’d like to thank the Dixie Chicks [for] the
way they handled themselves through a lousy time … and for having the
strength to say ‘no,’ and for their insistence on always doing the right thing. …
Freedom of speech is only important if it’s exercised. Celebrities should
not shut up and sing: They should stand up and shout, and we must support them.”

‘Stand Up and Shout’

In a similar spirit, during his March 24, 2007, speech, Sean Penn declared: “
Well, you and the smarmy pundits in your pocket, those who bathe in the
moisture of your soiled and bloodstained underwear, can take that noise and shove
it. We will be snowed no more. Let’s make this crystal-clear. We do support
our troops in our stand, while you exploit them and their families. The
verdict is in. You lied, connived, and exploited your own countrymen and, most of
all, our troops … you Misters Bush and Cheney; you, Ms. Rice, are
villainously and criminally obscene people. …”

Their courage and creativity sustained dissident artists, as the tide of
public opinion eventually began to turn. In 2004, Penn and co-star Tim Robbins
won Oscars for “Mystic River,” a film about child-killing and abuse, directed
by Clint Eastwood, who went on to helm the anti-war-themed 2007 best-picture
nominee “Letters From Iwo Jima.” And the Dixie Chicks swept 2007’s Grammys,
as their single “Not Ready to Make Nice” expressed the band’s fighting
spirit. These awards are affirmations for contrarian performers in industries
subject to popular and commercial whims.

Likewise, in the decades following their censure, some blacklist-era artists
also made comebacks. Dalton Trumbo wrote numerous movies, including “
Spartacus,” and directed and wrote the 1971 pacifist picture “Johnny Got His Gun,”
which won the Jury Grand Prize at that year’s Cannes Film Festival. Ring
Lardner won a screenwriting Oscar for 1970’s anti-war comedy “M*A*S*H,” and
screenwriter Waldo Salt won for 1969’s “Midnight Cowboy,” which also took the
best-director and best-picture Academy Awards. Salt was also co-nominated for
1974’s “Serpico” and co-won another Oscar for 1978’s anti-Vietnam-War drama.
“Coming Home,” starring Jane Fonda and Jon Voight. Abraham Polonsky’s “Tell
Them Willie Boy Is Here” (1969) was a gritty look at indigenous Americans’
plight.

The Committee for the First Amendment ’47/’07 was formed this year, not
just to commemorate the Hollywood 10 and the blacklist or to seek redress for
past grievances. Rather, the main reason for its creation was to remind people
about a previous era of repression in order to shine a light on contemporary
censorship against dissenting artists so that another blacklist—and a new
brand of McCarthyism—never comes to pass. The following is a list of several
artists and media figures who have paid the price for dissenting since Sept. 11,
2001.

“Watch What You Say”: The Post-9/11 Dixie Chicked:

* Like truth, comedian Bill Maher was an early casualty of war. Discussing
9/11’s skyjackers on the Sept. 17, 2001, episode of “Politically Incorrect,”
Maher stated: “We have been the cowards lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000
miles away. That’s cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building,
say what you want about it, it’s not cowardly. Stupid maybe, but not cowardly.
” Maher’s remarks prompted Bush’s then-spokesman Ari Fleischer to warn: “
Watch what you say.” The Disney-owned ABC network canceled Maher’s show in
June 2002.

* Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Phillip Noyce’s adaptation of Graham
Greene’s novel “The Quiet American,” starring Michael Caine and Brendan
Fraser, was reportedly shelved because it critiqued U.S. foreign policy in 1950s
Vietnam. According to the Toronto Sun, Miramax (then part of Disney) “
abandoned it because … Harvey Weinstein did not like the politics.” Caine, a
two-time Oscar winner knighted by Queen Elizabeth, was forced to plead for the
release of the film, which finally opened in November 2002.

* In February 2003, Sean Penn sued producer Steve Bing for $10 million for
allegedly firing the actor from a film because of Penn’s 2002 Washington Post
anti-war ad and trip to Baghdad. Bing counter-sued.

* After the Dixie Chicks’ frontwoman Natalie Maines said at a March 2003
concert in London, “[W]e’re ashamed that the president of the United States is
from Texas,” the Chicks, who were the top-selling all-girl group, went on to
lose airtime on country-western radio stations owned by Clear Channel and
other corporations, and CD and concert ticket sales plummeted. Egged on by
reactionary bloggers and DJs, anti-”DXC” listeners destroyed Dixie Chicks’ CDs
during “Dixie Chicks Destruction” events.

* In 2003, actor David Clennon was targeted by a right-wing Internet
campaign seeking to have him fired from CBS’ CIA series “The Agency” for comparing
Bush’s America to Nazi Germany.

* Conservatives attempted to impeach “acting president” Martin Sheen from
NBC’s “The West Wing” and his Visa and American Express endorsements.

* Also in 2003, right-wingers lobbied MCI to drop activist-actor Danny
Glover as its spokesman.

* As the Iraq war loomed, the peace sign Amanda Bynes flashed was removed
from ads for 2003’s “What a Girl Wants.”

* After Michael Moore said, “Shame on you, Mr. Bush,” at the March 23,
2003, Academy Awards ceremony, a right-wing, “pro-family” group published the
address of Moore’s house in rural Michigan, according to Moore, who said, “They
published a photo of it. My home was vandalized. There have been attempts to
do various things. Harvey and Bob [Weinstein] have to pay for 24/7 security
for me. It’s a rotten way to live.”

* Phil Donahue’s liberal-leaning talk show was canceled on March 28, 2003,
despite being MSNBC’s highest rated program (surpassing “Hardball”).

* Madonna reportedly self-censored her April 2003 “American Life” music
video.

* On April 6, 2003, CBS fired Ed Gernon after the producer of the 2003
miniseries “Hitler: The Rise of Evil” told TV Guide that the series’ story “
basically boils down to an entire nation gripped by fear who ultimately chose to
give up their civil rights and plunge the whole world into war. I can’t think
of a better time to examine this history than now.” The New York Post, owned
by Rupert Murdoch, denounced “Hitler: The Rise of Evil” as “a sign of
Hollywood’s anti-Americanism.” Fox News commentator and “Bush Country” author
John Podhoretz called the docudrama “an act of slander against the president”
in his New York Post column.

* In 2003, the Cooperstown, N.Y., Baseball Hall of Fame canceled a 15th
anniversary “Bull Durham” commemoration because of the anti-war politics of its
stars Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon. On April 15, 2003, Robbins told
Washington’s National Press Club: “A history teacher tells [my] 11-year-old …
nephew [that] Sarandon is endangering the troops by her opposition to the war.
Another teacher … asks our niece if we are coming to the school play. ‘They’
re not welcome here,’ said the molder of young minds. … A friend listen[s]
to the radio down South as the talk radio host calls for the murder of a
prominent anti-war activist. Death threats have appeared on other prominent
anti-war activists’ doorsteps. … Relatives of ours have received threatening
e-mails and phone calls. And my 13-year-old boy … has recently been
embarrassed and humiliated by a sadistic creep who writes—or, rather, scratches his
column with his fingernails in dirt. Susan and I have been listed as traitors,
as supporters of Saddam … by the Aussie gossip rags masquerading as
newspapers, and by their ‘fair and balanced’ electronic media cousins, 19th Century
Fox.”

* At a September 2003 fundraiser for presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich,
actor Ed Begley Jr. said: “There’s a boycott list on the Internet for all
the people who spoke out against the war, to write letters to studios telling
them you don’t want to see shows featuring Jamie Cromwell, [myself], Ed
Asner, Tim Robbins. … Janeane Garofalo [took] a big hit. They’ve suffered
financially, can’t get work now. They’ve been blackballed. People don’t want to
hire them. … Janeane gets so much hate mail. … I didn’t work from when that
boycott list happened until just a few weeks ago. … I’ve never only worked
three days in nine months since … 1967.” Reactionary Web sites, including
celiberal.com and boycott-hollywood.net, urged boycotts of activist actors.

* Conservatives reportedly pressured CBS to edit and reschedule the
less-than-laudatory miniseries “The Reagans” from its original November 2003 CBS
broadcast date to 2004 on the cable TV channel Showtime, which—like CBS—is owned
by Viacom but has fewer viewers.

* The FCC proposed a $495,000 fine against six Clear Channel stations airing
Howard Stern’s radio show on April 8, 2004. The shock jock responded, “This
is a follow-up to the McCarthy-type ‘witch-hunt’ of the administration and
the activities of this group of presidential appointees in the FCC, led by ‘
Colin Powell Jr.’ [FCC Chairman Michael Powell]. … They … are … imposing
their opinions and rights to tell us all who and what we may listen to and
watch and how we should think. … It is pretty shocking that governmental
interference into our rights and free speech takes place in the U.S. It’s hard
to reconcile this with the ‘land of the free’ and the ‘home of the brave.’ I’
m sure what’s next is the removal of ‘dirty pictures’ like the 20th century
German exhibit in a New York City museum and the erotic literature in our
libraries; they too will fall into their category of ‘evil’ as well.”

* In May 2004, Disney reneged on its distribution deal for Michael Moore’s “
Fahrenheit 9/11,” momentarily leaving the Cannes Palme d’Or winner in limbo
until Lionsgate released it.

* After Linda Ronstadt praised “Fahrenheit 9/11” during her July 17, 2004,
concert at Las Vegas’ Aladdin resort, fans grew irate; she was escorted by
security guards off the property and banned from performing there again.

* CBS News producer Mary Mapes was fired, and Dan Rather eventually forced
out, after their Sept. 8, 2004 “60 Minutes II” election-year report challenged
George W. Bush’s Vietnam War service record. The expose presented compelling
evidence that strings had been pulled to get Bush out of going to ’Nam, and
into the Texas Air National Guard’s “Champagne Unit” instead.

* On Sept. 21, 2004, a Washington-bound passenger jet bearing British
musician Cat Stevens—who had long before converted to Islam and had re-recorded his
1970’s “Peace Train” hit to protest the Iraq war—was diverted to Maine
after U.S. authorities matched his name with one on a no-fly list. Homeland
Security denied Stevens admission to the U.S.

* Following a successful 2005 run on the London stage, on March 22, 2006,
the premiere of the pro-Palestinian rights play “My Name Is Rachel Corrie” at
off-Broadway’s New York Theatre Workshop was postponed. The drama was based on
the titular 23-year-old American peace activist, who was crushed on March
16, 2003, by an Israeli military bulldozer as she attempted to prevent the
demolition of a Palestinian pharmacist’s home in Gaza. The play finally debuted
at Greenwich Village’s Minetta Lane Theatre in October 2006.

* On Sept. 15, 2006, Bill Maher claimed that CBS News withdrew its offer for
the comic to appear in the short-lived “Free Speech” segment on Katie Couric
’s “CBS Evening News” program after Maher—an atheist—chose religion as his
proposed topic.

* In October 2006, right-winger Florian Sokolowski sent left-leaning talk
show host Stephanie Miller a letter declaring: “As with Cindy Sheehan, the best
thing that could happen to you would be seeing some wonderful activist
sticking an AK-47 up your glory holes and sending you into eternity.”

* By early 2007, the Clear Channel-owned radio station WTPG-AM changed its
liberal talk show format, dropping programs including the nationally syndicated
Stephanie Miller and Ed Schultz shows, although the Columbus, Ohio, station
had reportedly tripled its ratings. Miller, Schultz and Air America programs
were replaced by right-wing shows hosted by Michael Savage and Laura
Ingraham. Miller alleges, “There’s a concerted effort to shut down progressive talk.
[Conservative] Christians are buying radio stations.” In the April 6, 2007,
edition of the Los Angeles Times, Schultz claimed his program’s move to the
evening on Clear Channel-owned KTLK-AM in Los Angeles “has nothing to do with
ratings or sales.” “Big Eddie”—whom Talkers Magazine called America’s
leading “progressive talk” host—alleged that Air America “wrote [KTLK] a check”
to put a host with lower Arbitron ratings in Schultz’s afternoon time slot.

* Folk singer Joan Baez, who had performed at numerous anti-Vietnam-War
demonstrations, was forbidden to participate in John Mellencamp’s April 27, 2007,
Walter Reed Hospital concert for wounded troops.

* On the fourth anniversary of the start of the U.S. military’s “shock and
awe” campaign in Iraq, CNN’s White House correspondent Ed Henry sparred with
Bush’s press secretary over what the “recipe for success” in Iraq is. During
the March 19, 2007, briefing, Tony Snow told Henry to “zip it.”

* On May 2, 2007, the U.S. Treasury Department notified Michael Moore that
he was being investigated for violating the U.S. trade embargo’s travel
restrictions to Cuba by taking ailing 9/11 rescue workers for treatment there as
part of his movie “SiCKO.” In case U.S. authorities tried to seize it, Moore
hid a copy of his health-care documentary in an overseas safe house. After “
SiCKO” opened on June 29, Moore was grilled by many mainstream media outlets
with the kind of zeal the corporate press had failed to exhibit during the
lead-up to the Iraq war.

* On May 9, 2007, retired Maj. Gen. John Baptiste, former commander of the
First Infantry in Iraq, appeared in an anti-war TV ad—and was quickly fired as
a CBS news consultant.

* Following a May 23, 2007, on-the-air confrontation with conservative
co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Rosie O’Donnell quit ABC’s “The View” before her
contract expired. The outspoken O’Donnell called Hasselbeck “cowardly” for not
defending her when “Republican pundits” accused O’Donnell of equating
American troops with “terrorists.”

* On June 25, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against former Alaska high
school student Joseph Frederick, who had unfurled a “Bong Hits 4 Jesus”
banner seen on national TV during the Olympic relay. Frederick contended that
subsequent reprisals by school administrators violated his First Amendment
rights. This was the high court’s first ruling on student free speech rights in 20
years.

* The Interior Department and Republican Sens. James Inhofe and Mitch
McConnell reportedly blocked the U.S. portion of the anti-global-warming Live Earth
telecast from taking place at Washington’s National Mall. The July 7, 2007,
global concert and environmental fundraiser was co-presented by Al Gore,
whose documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” won an Oscar.

* In a front-page story, the August 21, 2007, Los Angeles Times reported
that the Israeli Defense Forces are blacklisting celebrities and performers who
have evaded the draft or not completed their service, barring them from
entertaining at military functions and venues and on its media outlets.

* When Sally Field attempted to make an anti-war statement during her
acceptance speech on the Sept. 16, 2007, Emmy awards ceremony televised live on FOX
TV, network censors cut the audio and video. What the censored actress said
was,”Let’s face it, if the mothers ruled the world, there would be no
goddamned wars in the first place.”

* Former CBS news anchor Dan Rather filed a $70-million wrongful termination
lawsuit against CBS on Sept. 19, 2007, alleging that, in the aftermath of
the “60 Minutes II” report charging that Bush had ducked military service, CBS
had made Rather a “scapegoat” in order to “pacify” the White House. Rather
told the L.A. Times that “any money he collects will go to nonprofit groups,
including the Committee to Protect Journalists.”

* The U.S. Senate passed a resolution condemning a MoveOn.org ad by a 72-25
vote on Sept. 20, 2007. MoveOn’s full-page ad in The New York Times was
headlined and subheaded: “General Petraeus or General Betray Us? Cooking the books
for the White House.” Apparently the 22 Democratic senators who voted with
the majority agreed with Bush, who attacked MoveOn’s ad as “disgusting.”

On Oct. 26, the precise 60th anniversary of the Committee for the First
Amendment’s first “Hollywood Fights Back!” broadcast, contemporary talents,
along with blacklist survivors and their relatives, will reenact the original
1947 radio program. Performers scheduled to participate include: former SAG
President Ed Asner, Norma Barzman, Larry Gelbart, Isabelle Gunning (ACLU/Southern
California president), Marsha Hunt, Camryn Manheim, Ramona Ripston,
Christopher Trumbo, James Whitmore and Becca Wilson. The event, presented by the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, will take place at Los Angeles’ Skirball
Center. For more information call (213) 977-9500, Ext. 227.

Picking A Democratic Presidential “Winner” Candidate

Posted in Uncategorized, Labor union news & views, Civil Liberties/ Constitutional Issues by Administrator on November 4th, 2007

Picking A Democratic Presidential “Winner” Candidate

Let me start this column with a personal admission, I like all the Democratic Presidential candidates. Frankly, every single Democratic contender is far superior to any of the announced Republican candidates. Picking a “winner” candidate for Democrats should include the ability to get elected in the general election, the ability to govern effectively and a proven commitment to the core values of the grassroots Democrats.

My personal belief is that former Senator John Edwards and Senator Joe Biden are the best choices. Both are extremely intelligent. They are both obviously sincere and strongly committed to Democratic values. In my personal opinion, Edwards and Biden can win in many of the red states against any of the potential Republican candidates.

Edwards and Biden have genuine roots in working class America. They were not born to wealth and power like George W. Bush. They understand hard work can lead to success with a little luck. Both candidates want to keep access to opportunity open so poor and middle class Americans can move ahead. They want all Americans to have a better lifestyle than their parents.

It is my belief that Biden and Edwards both would try to do something to curb the exploding federal deficit without curbing those essential government programs that actually help the majority of average citizens. I believe they would reverse the anti-working class, anti-middle class bias of the Bush Administration immediately. I believe they would curb excess corporate influence in those agencies of the federal government that should be regulating corporate excesses.

Biden and Edwards have long track records of being friendly to organized labor. The Employee Free Choice Act would certainly be signed into law under either candidate if they were elected. Senator Joe Biden has been a friend of American workers since he was first elected to the US Senate in 1972. He has a 35+ year proven record. Former Senator John Edwards has been actively walking union picket lines and speaking up aggressively on behalf of the labor agenda since leaving his US Senate seat to seek the Presidency.

Neither candidate is very good at spinning their records or positions to win votes. Both are just straight shooters who tell the truth. I find this refreshing after 7 years of Bush-Cheney lying and deception. With the Republican candidates, we are going to get more of the Bush-Cheney treatment. I am not sure the nation could survive another Presidential term of Bush-Cheney lies, deception and failed policies.

Edwards and Biden are not going to let the Republicans lie their way back into power without revealing the truth. Both men are certainly fearless! They would both be good fighters for truth, justice and fairness.

Both candidates have a very strong commitment to the rule of law, American traditions and the US Constitution. They would not permit the politicization of the Department of Justice to continue. They would not nominate radical Right Wing, partisan federal judges. They would preserve American civil liberties. They would restore respect for America around the world.

Biden and Edwards will not lie to the public. They are realistic leaders devoted to making government work for the little guy. They have not sold their souls to Wall Street or international corporations. They will not be controlled by lobbyists.
I hope the 2008 Democratic Presidential ticket includes either Biden or Edwards or both. Any ticket that includes either or both would be a winner in the election. More importantly, it would be a winner in office!

Written by Stephen Crockett (co-host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com and Editor of Mid-Atlantic Labor.com http://www.midatlanticlabor.com ). Mail: P.O. Box 283, Earleville, Maryland 21919. Email: midsouthcm@aol.com. Phone: 443-907-2367.

Feel free to publish at no charge and without prior approval.


« Previous entries ·